Intersectionality is a concept that evolved in the United States during the 1970s and ‘80s, challenging the exclusionary tendencies of feminist activism in the country, which was dominated by white women and sidelined the experiences of racial and sexual minorities. The framework helps understand how multiple inequalities or disadvantages act simultaneously and interconnectedly to amplify discrimination. Intersectionality posits disadvantages along multiple social categories, such as gender, race, religion, caste, etc., which “not only add up, but overlap, mutually reinforce, intertwine, and co-constitute each other in specific historical and geopolitical contexts”. For instance, a woman belonging to an oppressed caste, because of overlapping inequalities arising out of gender and caste, faces far more severe marginalization than a woman belonging to an oppressor caste or a man belonging to the same oppressed caste. In short, intersectionality argues that the experiences of no two persons can be considered equal without considering the positions of the other markers of their identity.
As in the US, intersectionality took root in the space of feminist activism in India before spreading to other fields. Organized feminist activism in the country, termed the ‘Indian Women’s Movement’ (IWM), gained prominence in the 1970s. It played a huge role in bringing public attention to cases of sexual violence and driving the recognition that sexual harassment is used as a tool to oppress women. However, as in Western activism, which was dominated by white women, early feminist activism in India was led by women belonging to oppressor castes. As such, the movement has been criticized for “its blindness to the sexual politics of caste”. The situation improved with the rise of Dalit feminist scholarship that shone a light on the masculinization of the Dalit and the savarnization of women in the caste and feminist scholarship, respectively. They urged the women’s movement to acknowledge the heterogeneity and contradiction within the lived experience of women who straddle multiple identities of caste, class, race, ethnicity, and religion. They warned against collapsing women’s marginalities into a general class category.
The recognition of intersectionality among feminist activists in the country further increased with the 1992 case of Bhanwari Devi, an oppressed caste woman who was raped by men belonging to oppressor castes for her social work against child marriage. A lower court acquitted the accused in the Bhanwari Devi case on the grounds that it was implausible that oppressor caste men would rape an oppressed caste woman because of the possibility of “caste-based pollution”, i.e., a religious belief that an oppressor caste person will be polluted by the touch of or interaction with a person from the oppressed caste, in part due to the occupation that the latter were, and in some cases still are, engaged in, like manual removal of feces or handling of animal corpses. The verdict led to widespread protests in the country, which triggered the growth of intersectional and, particularly, Dalit feminist standpoints in the country. Another factor that influenced the growth of intersectionality in the country was the liberalization of India’s economy in the early 1990s. Liberalization led to the entry of several international NGOs focusing on women’s rights into the economy. Many of these NGOs were funded by the West and UN agencies that pushed the concept of intersectionality as part of their funding agenda.
While in the earlier years of intersectional feminism in India, much of the focus was on caste- and gender-based inequalities, over the years, the concept led to the recognition of several identity markers that co-determine a person’s social location and overlap to further disadvantage them. In recent years, scholars have argued that an intersectional approach is necessary to understand online gender-based violence (OGBV) more holistically. Therefore, this module seeks to highlight how gender intersects with different identity markers to exacerbate the experience of OGBV and what the law enforcement and judiciary can do to address this intersectional experience.